Government to close business rates loophole
Many second home owners use a loophole to avoid council tax on the property. However, the government has announced that new rules will apply to prevent abuse from April next year. What’s going on?

Under the current system, owners of second properties in England can avoid a council tax bill if there is an intention to let the property to holiday makers. This brings the property into the business rates regime and, as a result, small businesses rates relief can be claimed. The problem is that many second home owners are declaring an intention to let their property, when in reality they just remain empty for most of the time.
From April 2023, the rules will change so that only genuine holiday lettings will qualify for the relief, bringing non-qualifying properties back into the charge to council tax. A property will only be assessed under the business rates regime if the owner can provide evidence that:
- it will be available for letting commercially, as self-catering accommodation, for short periods totalling at least 140 days in the coming year;
- during the previous year, it was available for letting commercially, as self-catering accommodation, for short periods totalling at least 140 days; and
- during the previous year, it was actually let commercially, as self-catering accommodation, for short periods totalling at least 70 days.
Related Topics
-
Do you need to pay tax on loyalty points and cashback?
You’ve been making business purchases on your personal credit card and reaping the rewards in the form of airmiles and cashback. What, if anything, do you need to do to keep on the right side of HMRC?
-
Welsh government plans to tweak relief for buyers
The draft Welsh Budget 2026/27 confirmed there would be no changes in the rates of land transaction tax. However, it did reveal some related changes are being planned. What’s the full story?
-
Can you claim input tax without a VAT invoice?
One of our clientss cannot provide a tax invoice to HMRC to support an input tax claim on the purchase of machinery three years ago. What alternative evidence should be acceptable to the officer?